Australia Settles Class Action Lawsuit Over Abuse At Manus Detention Facility

$53 million in compensation lauded by asylum seekers; 'We are finally being heard'

MELBOURNE, Australia (Radio Australia, June 14, 2017) – Asylum seekers who alleged they endured physical and psychological harm on Manus Island between 2012 and 2016 say they "are finally being heard" after the Federal Government agreed to pay $70 million [US$53 million] in compensation.

The group alleged the Commonwealth breached its duty of care by holding them in conditions that did not meet Australian standards.

During the period of their incarceration there was also a riot that resulted in the death of an asylum seeker and serious injuries to other detainees.

They also claimed they were falsely imprisoned after Papua New Guinea's Supreme Court ruled their detention was illegal.

A Victorian Supreme Court trial against the Commonwealth and security companies Transfield and G4S, which had been delayed for several months, was due to start today and had been expected to run for six months.

Law firm Slater and Gordon, which ran the class action, believed it to have been the largest immigration detention trial ever in Australia.

When it began, legal representatives for the plaintiff told the court it had reached an agreement to settle the case.

The in-principle agreement, subject to court approval, will include payment of plaintiffs' legal costs, which to date are more than $20 million [US$15 million].

Slater and Gordon lawyer Rory Walsh said the settlement agreement was not an admission of liability from the Government.

"The settlement comes with a denial of liability and the implications of this case we will leave others to comment on," he said.

"It denied it was doing the false imprisoning ... the Commonwealth defence was that it was the PNG authorities doing the imprisoning and detaining and not them.

"The denial of liability allows the Commonwealth and the defendants to run those positions in any other cases and maintain that position, the extent to which this $70 million settlement undermines the ability for them to do that or whether indeed it passes the pub test, is a matter for others to comment upon.

"We just ran it as a legal case."

Lawyer Andrew Baker, also from Slater and Gordon, said if the settlement was approved, individual amounts of compensation would be decided based on the asylum seekers' experience.

"Individual settlement amounts will be calculated fairly, objectively and individually with regard to the length of each person's detention, the events and conditions they have experienced and been present for and the severity of injuries each person has suffered," he said.

"This settlement is an important step towards recognising the extremely hostile conditions the detainees endured at Manus Island.

"Fleeing religious persecution and violence and they came to Australia seeking protection but rather than considering their cases on shore, the Government sent this vulnerable group of people to be held on Manus Island indefinitely."

'We are finally being heard'

The class action was led by 35-year-old Iranian man Majid Karami Kamasaee, who was detained on Manus Island for 11 months from September 2013, and remains in a Melbourne detention centre.

Mr Kamasaee claimed he was persecuted by Iranian authorities for converting to Christianity, and that he had to flee the country under threat of being jailed for his religious beliefs.

He attempted to reach Australia by boat from Indonesia but it was intercepted by the Navy and he was transferred to the offshore processing centre.

In a statement read by lawyer Ebony Birchall, Mr Kamasaee said the settlement agreement meant he and his friends still in detention were "finally being heard".

"I cried every night until I had nothing left. I watched my friends reach breaking point and I prayed we would make it through," he said.

"Sadly many of my friends are still on Manus Island. It feels like they have been given life sentences.

"Our voices have never been listened to but today we are finally being heard and I hope everyone's suffering can be over as quickly as possible."

Law firm Slater and Gordon, which ran the class action, believed it to have been the largest immigration detention trial ever in Australia.

Radio Australia
Copyright © 2017 Radio Australia. All Rights Reserved

Rate this article: 
Average: 3.3 (4 votes)


interesting.What it means to me is that any refugee can come to australia through the back door.The Gov has to deal with the situation and in this case put them on Manus.if THEY WERE ALLEDLY ESCAPING PERSECUTION or other reason I would have thought there would have been an appreciation that they were still alive being fed and have the patience to work with the system as such but instead from day one there have been consistent moaning and groaning.If they were in their own country they would be imprisioned or shot. I sympathize with genuine refugees don't misunderstand where I am Coming from however I strongly disagree with this courtcase by the Victorian where refugees are going to be paid money.Irrespective of the reasoning this decision is deplorable and in my mind IT STINKS..It wouldnt be tolerated in their own country. IF anything Where Before I was pro Refugee now sadly not any more. I take my hat off those refugees who have come through the front to australia and have managed.... are the collection of dogooders going to make sure theses people are given the same consideration....probably not but if thereis money to be made its a thought. IN writing this epistle i am angry,totally brassed off but i am not a racist....... think about it

Peter, where is your humanity? Put yourself in these helpless people fleeing their torn countries looking for a place to live a normal life and all you can think about is political side of it and $. Shame on you!

Add new comment